The Rivers State House of
Assembly has condemned what it described as the arrest and harassment of the
state Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) of the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC), Mrs. Gesila Khan, and other senior officials of the
commission by the Directorate of State Security (DSS).
In a statement issued Thursday and titled: ‘Protest over undue
interference in Rivers State election petitions pending before the Election Petition Tribunals’, the
assembly expressed displeasure against the DSS, stating that the arrest of the
REC under any guise was uncalled for.
The statement, which was signed
by 31 lawmakers and read by the Speaker, Ikuinyi Ibani, called on the DSS to
desist from further arrest and intimidation of any official involved in
election petitions in the state.
“We, the undersigned members of
the Rivers State House of Assembly, hereby, for ourselves and on behalf of the
entire good people of Rivers State, that we represent, express our deepest
worries and displeasure against the undue interference and meddlesomeness in
the political affairs of Rivers State and the Election Petitions Tribunal
sitting in Abuja.“We have watched with dismay the way and manner the DSS has been intimidating and harassing electoral
officers connected with or handling matters relating to the 2015 general
elections held in Rivers State, as well as the election petitions.
“We have it on good authority
that the Rivers State REC, Mrs. Khan, and her officers were orally invited to
DSS office in Abuja and she honoured the invitation with her senior officers on
Tuesday, July 22, 2015, only to be arrested and detained till about 10p.m. on
Wednesday, July 23, with further instructions to report to the DSS daily.
“It is important to state that
Section 2, sub-Section 3 of the National Security Agencies Act, Cap. 74, 2004,
has defined the functions of the DSS, which are limited to crimes bordering on
the internal security of the country such as insurrections. Again, we make bold
to say that INEC is a party at the election petition tribubal and the arrest of
Mrs. Khan under the guise of preventing breakdown of law and order is not only
laughable, but condemnable.
The assembly also faulted the
visit of the immediate past governor of the state, Chibuike Amaechi, to the
DSS, pointing out that his visit and the “unfolding drama leaves much to be
desired for our country”.
It insisted: “It is wrong for the
state security apparatus to be used to intimidate parties concerning pending
matters in court or any tribunal using all kinds of allegations three months
after elections. We, therefore, call on the DSS to desist from further arrest
or intimidation of any official involved directly or indirectly in the election
petitions.”
Equally, members of the National
Assembly from the state have accused the
DSS of undue interference in the state’s election petition tribunals with the
intention to influence the outcome.
The lawmakers accused the former
state Governor, Mr. Rotimi Amaechi, of instigating the agency to harass and
intimidate officials of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
who were involved in the conduct of the 2015 general elections in the state.
Briefing journalists in Abuja
yesterday, their Leader, Senator George
Thompson-Sekibo alleged that the
Resident Electoral Commissioner, Mrs. Gesila Khan, was detained by the DSS in
Abuja when she honoured an oral invitation on July 21, 2015 and was not
released until 10p.m. the next day.
“It is also not a co-incidence
that the invitation to parties (INEC officers) and arrest came after a private
visit of Amaechi to the Director SSS on
or about Tuesday, July 7, 2015. Shortly after his visit, Amaechi assured the
petitioners that (in his words) “the DSS is game.” Sekibo said.
Flanked by the lawmakers from the
state, he recalled that Section 2, sub-section 3 of the National Security
Agencies Act, Cap. 74, 2004, defines the function of the DSS as limited to
crimes/actions bordering on the internal security of the country such as the
Boko Haram threat.
“It is not their business to
invite parties in a court case and interrogate them further…We are not speaking
for INEC, but we are seeking that justice should prevail. There must be
balance, and they should stay away from these people (INEC officials) just as
we stay away from them. Its prejudice because when a case is in court, you
do not interfere,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment